MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920595461 · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2019.2902820

Modeling of Multivariable Fuzzy Systems by Semitensor Product

2019· article· en· W2920595461 on OpenAlexafffund
Hong L. Lyu, Wilson Wang, Xiao P. Liu, Zhengqi Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMultivariable calculusFuzzy logicFuzzy associative matrixNeuro-fuzzyMathematicsFuzzy control systemControl theory (sociology)DefuzzificationFuzzy set operationsFuzzy numberFuzzy setComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceControl engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new fuzzy formulation technique based on semitensor product of matrices is proposed in this paper to construct multivariable fuzzy logic systems. A fuzzy relation matrix (FRM) model is suggested for direct modeling and indirect identification of the fuzzy matrix expression using the observed input-output data of fuzzy dynamical process. The center points of fuzzy sets for every output variable are optimized by using least squares estimation. The effectiveness of the proposed fuzzy formulation technology is verified by simulations. Test results show that the proposed formulation technique is an effective design method to construct and optimize fuzzy relation structure matrices for multivariable fuzzy systems. It can be used to design FRM models for multi-input multi-output systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy SystemsSame topicFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207