MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920637125 · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2902316

Effective Geometry Monte Carlo: A Fast and Reliable Simulation Framework for Molecular Communication

2019· article· en· W2920637125 on OpenAlexafffund
Fatih Dinç, Matija Medvidović, Leander Thiele

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Communication and Nanonetworks
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersUniversity of WaterlooStudienstiftung des Deutschen VolkesOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceGovernment of CanadaInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
KeywordsMonte Carlo methodMolecular communicationComputer scienceTransmitterDiffusionAlgorithmRange (aeronautics)Reliability (semiconductor)Point (geometry)Stochastic geometryChannel (broadcasting)Statistical physicsGeometryMathematicsPhysicsStatisticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angular information of messenger molecules absorbed by a receiver plays a significant role in the molecular communication literature. In this paper, we address systematic biases and random errors in the angular information stemming from finite step sizes encountered in traditional simulation frameworks. We show that the effective geometry Monte Carlo (EG-MC) simulation algorithm, which modifies the geometry of the receiver, is a fast and reliable simulation method to overcome these systematic biases. We motivate our approach for a 3-D unbounded diffusion channel consisting of an absorbing receiver and a point transmitter. We show that, with minimal computational cost, the angular distribution of the absorbed particles by the receiver can be precisely obtained using EG-MC algorithm. Afterwards, we demonstrate the accuracy of our simulations and compare them to traditional methods. Then, we comment on the range of applicability of our results. Finally, we consider two simple cases with constant flow and show that the EG-MC algorithm gives consistent results even when the drift is dominant over diffusion. We conclude with further remarks on the computational efficiency and reliability of the EG-MC method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicMolecular Communication and NanonetworksFrench-language works237,207