Incremental Deep Computation Model for Wireless Big Data Feature Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Big data feature learning is a crucial issue for the service management for Internet of Things. However, big data collected from Internet of Things is of dynamic nature at a high speed, which poses an important challenge on wireless big data learning models, especially the deep computation model. In this paper, an incremental deep computation model is proposed for wireless big data feature learning in Internet of Things. First, two incremental tensor auto-encoders (ITAE) are developed by devising two incremental learning algorithms, namely parameter-based incremental learning algorithm (PI-TAE) and structure-based incremental learning algorithm (SI-TAE), when new wireless samples are available. PI-TAE only updates the network parameters while SI-TAE simultaneously adjusts the structure and updates the parameters to adapt to the new arriving wireless big data. Furthermore, an incremental deep computation model is constructed by stacking several ITAEs. Experiments are conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed model by comparing with the conventional deep computation model and other two representative incremental learning algorithms, i.e., OANN and PIE. Results demonstrate that the presented model can modify the network in an incremental manner for new arriving data learning efficiently with preserving the prior knowledge for the previous data learning, proving its potential for dynamic wireless big data learning in Internet of Things.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it