Modified Firefly Algorithm With Chaos Theory for Feature Selection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conventional algorithms such as gradient-based optimization methods usually struggle to deal with high-dimensional non-linear problems and often land up with local minima. Recently developed nature-inspired optimization algorithms are the best approaches for finding global solutions for combinatorial optimization problems like microarray datasets. In this article, a novel hybrid swarm intelligence-based meta-search algorithm is proposed by combining a heuristic method called conditional mutual information maximization with chaos-based firefly algorithm. The combined algorithm is computed in an iterative manner to boost the sharing of information between fireflies, enhancing the search efficiency of chaos-based firefly algorithm and reduces the computational complexities of feature selection. The meta-search model is implemented using a well-established classifier, such as support vector machine as the modeler in a wrapper approach. The chaos-based firefly algorithm increases the global search mobility of fireflies. The efficiency of the model is studied over high-dimensional disease datasets and compared with standard firefly algorithm, particle swarm optimization, and genetic algorithm in the same experimental environment to establish its superiority of feature selection over selected counterparts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it