MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920808535 · doi:10.29252/qums.13.1.38

The association between Mediterranean Dietary Pattern and Depression, Anxiety, and Psychological Distress in Iranian Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

2019· article· en· W2920808535 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed Mohammad Mousavi, Omid Sadeghi, Ammar Hassanzadeh Keshteli, Ahmad Esmaillzadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueQom Univ Med Sci J · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyAssociation (psychology)Cross-sectional studyDepression (economics)Psychological distressMediterranean dietDistressClinical psychologyPsychologyPsychiatryMedicineInternal medicinePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives: Few studies have been performed on the adherence to the Mediterranean diet in relation to psychological health, particularly in the Middle East region. In the present study, the association between adherence to Mediterranean dietary pattern and psychological disorders (including depression, anxiety, and psychological distress), was investigated among a large population of Iranian adults. Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 3172 adults (aged 18-55 years). The Mediterranean regimen model, was derived from the Trichopoulou et al. method. To investigate the relationship between Mediterranean diet and mental disorders, logistic regression was used with three modified models. In addition to the Mediterranean diet, the same analysis was performed for that pattern of food associated with psychological disorders. Results: The participants with the highest adherence to the Mediterranean diet had lower risk for depression (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.46-0.78), anxiety (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.42-0.86), and psychological distress (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.45-0.79) compared to those with the lowest adherence. high intake of fruits and vegetables was associated with a lower risk of depression (Fruits: OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.31-0.54 and vegetables: OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.40-0.70), anxiety (Fruits: OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.39-0.79; vegetables: OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.39-0.84), and psychological distress (Fruits: OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.36-0.63; vegetables: OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.34-0.62). In contrast, high intake of grains was positively associated with depression (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.12-2.27), anxiety (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.11-2.82) and psychological distress (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.16-2.45). Conclusion: The findings of this study indicated an inverse association between adherence to Mediterranean dietary pattern and risk of psychological disorders (such as depression, anxiety, and psychological distress).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQom Univ Med Sci JSame topicNutritional Studies and DietFrench-language works237,207