Abstract 026: Apolipoprotein A-I Helical Registry Modulates Lecithin:cholesterol Acyl Transferase Activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structure of apolipoprotein (APOA1), the major protein of high density lipoproteins (HDL), can modulate protein interactions affecting the cardioprotective functions of HDL particles. APOA1 on nascent discoidal HDL is composed of ten, tandem, α-helical repeats arranged in an anti-parallel, stacked ring-structure that encapsulates a lipid bilayer. Previous chemical cross-linking studies suggested that these APOA1 rings may adopt two different orientations, or registries, with respect to each other. These orientations include one where the bulk of APOA1 orients with the 5 th helix of one molecule opposing the 5 th helix of the other (5/5 helical registry), and another orientation adopting a 5/2 helical registry. Engineered HDL particles locked in both 5/5 and 5/2 registries, or rotamers, equally promoted cholesterol efflux from macrophages, indicating functional particles. However, the ability of lecithin:cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT) to esterify cholesterol was increased over WT in the 5/5 rotamer, and dramatically impaired in the 5/2 rotamer ( p<0.001 ), despite surface plasmon resonance studies showing that LCAT bound equally to both. Cross-linking experiments indicated that LCAT activity requires a hybrid epitope composed of helices 5-7 on one APOA1 molecule and 3-4 on the other. Thus, the reciprocating nature of APOA1’s structure may represent a thumbwheel mechanism that influences the activity of HDL remodeling factors in plasma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".