MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920840094 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2019.2903787

Nonlinear Mutual Coupling Compensation Operator Design Using a Novel Electromagnetic Machine Learning Paradigm

2019· article· en· W2920840094 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoupling (probability)Nonlinear systemDigital signal processingComputer scienceElectronic engineeringCompensation (psychology)Coupling (piping)EngineeringPhysicsControl engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a technology that utilizes a unified electromagnetic machine learning (EM-ML) technique to mitigate the effect of mutual coupling in receiving antenna array configurations. The recently developed antenna current Green's function (ACGF) formalism is deployed to explicate the electromagnetic behavior of antennas in the form of an accurate digital signal processing (DSP) model, including mutual coupling interactions between radiators. A deep learning framework is devised and combined with the ACGF-based DSP model to design a novel nonlinear mutual coupling compensation operator providing higher decoupling capabilities in comparison to previously reported linear methods. A direction-of-arrival estimation application is presented to validate the proposed EM-ML system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it