MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920840094 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2019.2903787

Nonlinear Mutual Coupling Compensation Operator Design Using a Novel Electromagnetic Machine Learning Paradigm

2019· article· en· W2920840094 on OpenAlexaff
Abdelelah M. Alzahed, Said Mikki, Yahia M. M. Antar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoupling (probability)Nonlinear systemDigital signal processingComputer scienceElectronic engineeringCompensation (psychology)Coupling (piping)EngineeringPhysicsControl engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a technology that utilizes a unified electromagnetic machine learning (EM-ML) technique to mitigate the effect of mutual coupling in receiving antenna array configurations. The recently developed antenna current Green's function (ACGF) formalism is deployed to explicate the electromagnetic behavior of antennas in the form of an accurate digital signal processing (DSP) model, including mutual coupling interactions between radiators. A deep learning framework is devised and combined with the ACGF-based DSP model to design a novel nonlinear mutual coupling compensation operator providing higher decoupling capabilities in comparison to previously reported linear methods. A direction-of-arrival estimation application is presented to validate the proposed EM-ML system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation LettersSame topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207