MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920883224 · doi:10.4000/books.pus.1580

Bonjour, le cinéma et le régime médiatique de la télévision

2018· book-chapter· fr· W2920883224 on OpenAlexaff
Suzanne Beth

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Strasbourg eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une telle prétention à la validité générale s’était déjà fait jour dans le cinéma américain des années cinquante, dont les images étaient […] portées par la ferme conviction qu’il ne pouvait exister aucune autre vision du monde.Harun Farocki, « Le point de vue de la guerre »Bonjour, réalisé par Ozu en 1959, fait partie de ses films « tardifs », ainsi qu’est souvent qualifiée la production des dernières années d’activité du cinéaste. Il s’agit de son second film en couleurs, Fleurs d’équinoxe...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Strasbourg eBooksSame topicPolitical and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207