MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920884714 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz006.211

A212 PREDICTIVE OVERBOOKING TO PREVENT ENDOSCOPY CLINIC NONATTENDANCE: MODEL DEVELOPMENT

2019· article· en· W2920884714 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tian Jian Lu, Sadia Khan, Lawrence Hookey

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Healthcare and Medical Tourism
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEsophagogastroduodenoscopyColonoscopyHealth careAttendanceReferralSigmoidoscopyWorkloadAbsenteeismEndoscopyLogistic regressionOutpatient clinicVeterans AffairsEmergency medicineFamily medicineSurgeryInternal medicineCancerColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Outpatient endoscopy is a procedure that has a historically high nonattendance rate. This situation runs counter to the current logic of rationalizing healthcare resources in Canada and necessitates the development of novel strategies to improve efficiency in care delivery. Given the success of the predictive overbooking model in the Veterans Affairs Greater LA Healthcare System developed by Reid et al. in 2015, we wondered if a similar model could be implemented in Canada. This study aims to develop an algorithm based on electronic health record data for identifying patient absenteeism at the outpatient endoscopy clinic at the Kingston Health Sciences Centre - Hotel Dieu Hospital Site in Kingston, Ontario. In this retrospective case-control study, we manually reviewed 1219 charts from March 2017 and May 2017. Patients included in this study were scheduled for esophagogastroduodenoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and other procedures requiring time in the endoscopy suite such as paracenteses. We collected data on previously identified factors that were found to impact outpatient endoscopy attendance rates and then fitted a multivariate logistic regression model to evaluate nonattendance risk. Univariate analyses identified several independently significant variables (p < 0.05) for no show including the season of the appointment date, bowel preparation requirements, marital status, referral type, indication for procedure, previous absenteeism from endoscopic procedures, cancellation proportion, and history of previous GI procedure. Further multivariate analysis identified three statistically significant predictors (p < 0.05) for our model including having a winter appointment date, having a high proportion of cancelled healthcare appointments to total healthcare appointments, and being referred to endoscopy by a specialist physician, including those triaged directly to endoscopy. Electronic health record data can be used to identify predictors of patient absenteeism and to generate a predictive model for nonattendance to outpatient endoscopic procedures. Interestingly, the winter season has a significant impact on no show rates and suggests a specific window of opportunity for predictive overbooking. Next steps include the prospective validation of this model to determine its accuracy in predicting nonattendance. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicGlobal Healthcare and Medical TourismFrench-language works237,207