MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920937108 · doi:10.1096/fj.201801635r

Sphingosine 1–phosphate signaling induces SNAI2 expression to promote cell invasion in breast cancer cells

2019· article· en· W2920937108 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Wang, Tatsuma Hind, Brenda Wan Shing Lam, Deron R. Herr

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational University Health SystemMinistry of Education - Singapore
KeywordsSphingosineSphingosine-1-phosphateBiologyCancer researchSphingosine kinase 1Epithelial–mesenchymal transitionTranscription factorCell biologyMetastasisGene knockdownSignal transductionCancer cellCancerApoptosisReceptorGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a critical process implicated in the initial stage of cancer metastasis, which is the major cause of tumor recurrence and mortality. Although key transcription factors that regulate EMT, such as snail family transcriptional repressor 2 (SNAI2), are well characterized, the upstream signaling pathways controlling these transcriptional mediators are largely unknown, which limits therapeutic strategies. Sphingosine 1–phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive lipid mediator, generated by sphingosine kinases (SPHK1 and SPHK2), that mainly exerts its effects by binding to the following 5 GPCRs: S1P 1 to S1P 5 . S1P signaling has been reported to regulate different aspects of cancer progression including cell proliferation, apoptosis, and migration; nevertheless, its role in cancer metastasis, specifically via EMT, is not established. Here we show that SPHK1 expression correlates significantly with EMT score in breast cancer cell lines, and with SNAI2 in patient‐derived breast tumors. Cell‐based assays demonstrate that S1P can rapidly up‐regulate the expression of SNAI2 in breast cancer cells via the activation of cognate receptors S1P 2 and S1P 3 . Knockdown studies suggest that S1P 2 and S1P 3 mediate this effect by activating myocardin‐related transcription factor A (MRTF‐A) and yes‐associated protein (YAP), respectively. Michigan Cancer Foundation 7 cells stably overexpressing S1P 2 or S1P 3 exhibit a more invasive phenotype, when compared to control cells. Taken together, our findings suggest that S1P produced by SPHK1 induces SNAI2 expression via S1P 2 ‐YAP and S1P 3 ‐MRTF‐A pathways, leading to enhanced cell invasion. Cumulatively, this study reveals a novel mechanism by which S1P activates parallel pathways that regulate the expression of SNAI2, a master regulator of EMT, and provides new insights into druggable therapeutic targets that may limit cancer metastasis. Wang, W., Hind, T., Lam, B. W. S., Herr, D. R. Sphingosine 1–phosphate signaling induces SNAI2 expression to promote cell invasion in breast cancer cells. FASEB J. 33, 7180–7191 (2019). www.fasebj.org

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZFrench-language works237,207