Aberrant Expression of Pseudogene-Derived lncRNAs as an Alternative Mechanism of Cancer Gene Regulation in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transcriptome sequencing has led to the widespread identification of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). Subsequently, these genes have been shown to hold functional importance in human cell biology, which can be exploited by tumors to drive the hallmarks of cancer. Due to their complex tertiary structure and unknown binding motifs there is a growing disparity between the number of lncRNAs identified and those that have been functionally characterized. As such, lncRNAs deregulated in cancer may represent critical components of cancer pathways that could serve as novel therapeutic intervention points. Pseudogenes are non-coding DNA sequences that are defunct relatives of their protein-coding parent genes but retain high sequence similarity. Interestingly, certain lncRNAs expressed from pseudogene loci have been shown to regulate the protein-coding parent genes of these pseudogenes in trans particularly because of this sequence complementarity. We hypothesize that this phenomenon occurs more broadly than previously realized, and that aberrant expression of lncRNAs overlapping pseudogene loci provides an alternative mechanism of cancer gene deregulation. Using RNA-sequencing data from two cohorts of lung adenocarcinoma, each paired with matched non-malignant samples, we discovered 104 deregulated pseudogene-derived lncRNAs. Remarkably, many of these deregulated lncRNAs (i) were expressed from the loci of pseudogenes related to known cancer genes, (ii) had expression that significantly correlated with protein-coding parent gene expression, and (iii) lncRNA protein-coding parent gene expression was significantly associated with survival. Here, we uncover evidence to suggest the lncRNA-pseudogene-protein-coding gene axis as a prominent mechanism of cancer gene regulation in lung adenocarcinoma, and highlights the clinical utility of exploring the non-coding regions of the cancer transcriptome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".