Seasonal predictability of the tropical Indian Ocean SST in the North American multimodel ensemble
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we investigate the predictability of the tropical Indian Ocean (TIO) sea surface temperature anomalies (SSTA) using the recently released North American Multimodel Ensemble dataset (NMME). We place emphasis on the predictability of two interannual variability modes: the Indian Ocean Basin mode (IOBM) and the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD). If defined by a 0.5 correlation skill, we find that the statistically skilful predictions correspond to an approximately 9- and 4-month lead for the two modes, respectively. We then applied a newly-developed predictability framework, i.e. Average Predictability Time method (APT), to explore the most potentially predictable mode (APT1) for the TIO SSTA. The derived APT1s correlate significantly to the IOBM and IOD, but are also characterised by several significant differences, which implies that there is a close link between the variability-related modes and the predictability-defined modes. Further analysis reveals that the predictability source of the IOBM-related APT1 originates from ENSO-induced thermocline variation over the southwest Indian Ocean, whereas wind-driven upwelling near Sumatra dominates IOD-related APT1. This study provides insights into the understanding of TIO SSTA predictability and offers a practical approach to obtain predictable targets to improve the TIO seasonal prediction skill.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".