Aperçu - Services d’injection supervisée : mesure d’intervention communautaire en réponse à la crise des opioïdes à Ottawa (Canada)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’établissement de services d’injection supervisée (SIS) est devenu courant dans les collectivités à risque élevé afin de réagir à la crise des opioïdes qui sévit actuellement au Canada. Le service de La Roulotte (The Trailer), qui a ouvert ses portes en novembre 2017 à Ottawa (Canada), suit de près la consommation des clients, le traitement des surdoses et l'inversion des effets d’une surdose. Nous avons analysé les données recueillies entre novembre 2017 et août 2018 par ce service. Aux heures de pointe, la demande de services a constamment dépassé la capacité de La Roulotte. Le nombre de traitements de surdoses et d'inversions des effets d’une surdose a considérablement augmenté au cours de la période. D’après les résultats, La Roulotte a fourni un service important – quoique non optimal (en raison de contraintes d’espace) – de réduction des méfaits dans cette collectivité à risque élevé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".