MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920995682 · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2019.02.013

The next level in chemical space navigation: going far beyond enumerable compound libraries

2019· review· en· W2920995682 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug Discovery Today · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsEmergent BioSolutions (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemical spacePharmacophoreSpace (punctuation)Computer scienceCheminformaticsParadigm shiftChemistVirtual screeningData scienceWorld Wide WebDrug discoveryNanotechnologyChemistryMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent innovations have brought pharmacophore-driven methods for navigating virtual chemical spaces, the size of which can reach into the billions of molecules, to the fingertips of every chemist. There has been a paradigm shift in the underlying computational chemistry that drives chemical space search applications, incorporating intelligent reaction knowledge into their core so that they can readily deliver commercially available molecules as nearest neighbor hits from within giant virtual spaces. These vast resources enable medicinal chemists to execute rapid scaffold-hopping experiments, rapid hit expansion, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) exploitation in largely intellectual property (IP)-free territory and at unparalleled low cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it