Macrocyclic complexes of Pt(<scp>ii</scp>) and Rh(<scp>iii</scp>) with iso-tellurazole <i>N</i>-oxides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pt(ii) and Rh(iii) readily form complexes with 3-methyl-5-aryl-1,2-tellurazole 2-oxides (L = (3-Me-5-Ar-1,2-C3HTe(NO)). The aryl group is either phenyl or 3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl, the latter case being a new derivative with enhanced solubility. The compound [Pt(3-Me-5-(3,5-tBu2C6H3)-1,2-C3HTe(NO))4](BF4)2 crystallizes in the P21/C space group featuring a square planar complex in the lattice. The crystal of [RhCl2(3-Me-5-(C6H5)-1,2-C3HTe(NO))4](BF4) belongs to the I4[combining macron] space group and contains an octahedral complex. In both instances, the iso-tellurazole N-oxide molecules are linked by TeO chalcogen bonding interactions confirming an annular tetramer that binds the metal ion as a κ4Te macrocycle in a boat conformation. Low-frequency shifts of the 125Te magnetic resonance upon coordination and the observation of 125Te-195Pt and 125Te-103Rh 1J coupling constants indicate that the complexes are stable species in solution. The complex ions were also observed in the electrospray mass spectra.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".