MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2921009382 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz006.132

A133 PEDIATRIC ONSET INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH MORE DISABILITY COMPARED TO ADULT ONSET DISEASE.

2019· article· en· W2921009382 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sherman Picardo, Remo Panaccione, Gilaad G. Kaplan, Cynthia Seow, Jennifer deBruyn, Yvette Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseUlcerative colitisAge of onsetInternal medicineCohortPsychosocialPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) during the pediatric years, may result in a larger burden of disability given that disease onset is coinciding with critical periods for physical and psychosocial development. The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Disability Index (IBD-DI) has recently been developed and validated to assess disability in patients with IBD. To assess the burden of disability in pediatric onset as compared with adult onset disease using this index. The IBD-DI was administered to a cohort of adult patients with either pediatric or adult onset IBD, matched by duration of disease, between February 2014 and September 2015, at the University of Calgary. Sociodemographic and clinical parameters including measures of disease activity, the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) for Crohn’s disease (CD) and Partial Mayo Score (PM) for ulcerative colitis (UC), were collected from participants as well as database review. A quantitative IBD-DI score was computed, based on a previously validated method.1 IBD-DI scores were compared between groups and bivariate analysis of variance was used to identify factors associated with disability level. 200 patients (101 pediatric onset, 99 adult onset) were recruited. The distributions in IBD-DI scores did not differ significantly between adult onset and pediatric onset disease (25.18± 13.98 vs. 22.16± 13.91, p=0.13) (Figure 1) There were also no significant differences in scores between Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis in adult onset (26.14±13.98 vs. 22.62±13.93, p=0.27) and pediatric onset disease (22.35±13.77 vs. 21.67±14.50, p=0.83) respectively. Age>25 years (p=0.02), female gender (p=0.04), active smokers (p =0.03) and clinically active disease (p<0.001) were associated with higher IBD-DI scores. IBD-DI scores correlated with measures of disease activity, PM(r=0.64, p<0.001) and HBI(r=0.65, p<0.001). Patients with pediatric onset disease demonstrated significantly higher negative influencer scores (family, p=0.04) and lower positive influencer scores (family, p= 0.02 and health professionals, p= 0.03.) Patients with paediatric onset IBD have a similar burden of disability compared with those with adult onset disease. They however were less likely to view family and health professional’s as facilitators and more likely to view family as a barrier to their disease and disability. Factors associated with higher disability scores include age>25 years, female gender, active smokers and clinically active disease. Reference: 1. Gower-Rousseau C, Sarter H, Savoye G, et al. Validation of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Disability Index in a population-based cohort. Gut.2017;66:588–596. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→