MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921051866 · doi:10.1017/rqx.2018.115

: <i>The Shakespearean Forest</i>

2019· article· en· W2921051866 on OpenAlexaff
Vin Nardizzi

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance Quarterly · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContent (measure theory)ArtAction (physics)Media studiesHistoryArt historySociologyMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Murray links Ferdinand's incestuous passion to the myth of Narcissus, a welcome mythopoetic supplement to the study's largely medical context, and she suggests that the historical figures for the story may indeed have been twins.Tragicomedies often shifted poor behavior from the twins to their wives and mothers.In Webster's The Devil's Law Case, two siblings, Romelio and Jolenta, pretend that Jolenta is pregnant with twins in order to disguise the gravidas of Romelio's girlfriend, the nun Angiolella.William Ryder's The Twins explores the passion that Charmia feels for her husband's twin brother.The scenario is resolved by a bed trick in which the husband poses as his own twin, a clever rendition of an old conceit.In comedy, twins trigger misrecognitions that produce funny situations, and they are perceived as blessings rather than curses to their parents, as in William Haughton's Patient Grissil.Shakespeare's twin plays go even further in defusing the fear of twins.Both Comedy of Errors and Twelfth Night draw on the Plautine conceit of mistaken identity, but the earlier comedy doubles the trouble, while the later work features fraternal twins who become more like identical twins through cross-dressing.Viola and Sebastian, born from a violent cesarean section on the shores of Illyria, embody the twin mysteries of birth as division, separation, and trauma, and of gender as both riven and merged.Although she notes literary sources, Murray's reliance on medical literature and broadsides occurs at the expense of detailed inquiry into myth, folklore, and anthropology.Where are Castor and Pollux, Romulus and Remus, and Jacob and Esau?Nonetheless, Murray has assembled a remarkable collection of texts unified around a single theme, and she has produced a thoughtful and coherent account of them as responses to the medical knowledge of the day.Meanwhile, my sister and I resemble Hermia and Helena's "double cherry-seeming parted / But yet an union in partition" (Midsummer Night's Dream 3.2.211-13),and I am blessed to share something with Cymbeline: "O what am I? / A mother to the birth of three?Ne'er mother / Rejoiced deliverance more" (5.6.369-71).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0970.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance QuarterlySame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207