Harvard 1926–1932: Early Research and Associates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lawrence J. Henderson, a Harvard biologist, was another influential man who supported Elton Mayo. In 1926–1927 Mayo worked with Harold D. Lasswell, who was twenty-two, on his personal problems, interviewing skills, and aspects of politics and psychoanalysis, which Lasswell would later make central to his career. Mayo was considering an offer to establish experimental psychology at McGill University, but when Wallace Brett Donham outlined his plans Mayo believed the Harvard research setting would be superior. He found the plan deficient because top managers were autocratic and unbending, middle and first-line supervisors felt the plan had diminished their influence, and employee representatives and associates used the plan to unionize the work force and promote socialism. Mayo carried his work beyond the conflict and squabbling within the organization of the mines and steel works to the sociological problems in the community. He was appalled by the illiteracy, overcrowding, ill health, and sexual promiscuity in Pueblo’s Mexican community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".