THE RESIDUAL LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE ON RETAINING WALL DUE TO VIBRATORY ROLLERS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compaction of backfill behind a retaining wall is normally affected by the compactors. Thecompaction plant can be represented approximately by a surcharge load equal to the weight ofthe roller. If a vibratory roller is employed, the centrifugal force due to the vibratingmechanism should be added to the static weight. After compaction, the lateral stress does notrevert to the basic value (kaγz). At a certain depth, the residual lateral pressure may be highenough to cause passive failure in the soil behind the retaining wall. The present paperanalyses the effect of compaction of the backfill behind the retaining walls. The values of theresidual lateral earth pressure induced by common compacting equipment the most parts ofthe world especially in Egypt are calculated by the classical methods (the method of Canadiancode of Practice). The study compares the method of Canadian Practice results and the resultsof the analysis using the finite element to enhance the method of calculation the lateral earthpressure due to compaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".