MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2921080121 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0ec1

Gemini Imaging of the Host Galaxies of Changing-look Quasars

2019· article· en· W2921080121 on OpenAlexaff
Paul J. L. Charlton, John J. Ruan, Daryl Haggard, Scott F. Anderson, Michael Eracleous, Chelsea L. MacLeod, Jessie C. Runnoe

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstrophysicsPhysicsQuasarGalaxyAstronomySurface brightnessActive galactic nucleusOVV quasarLuminous infrared galaxyPeculiar galaxyRadio galaxyGalaxy group

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Changing-look (CL) quasars are a newly discovered class of luminous active galactic nuclei that undergo rapid (≲10 yr) transitions between Type 1 and Type 1.9/2, with an associated change in their continuum emission. We characterize the host galaxies of four faded CL quasars using broadband optical imaging. We use gri images obtained with the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph on Gemini North to characterize the surface brightness profiles of the quasar hosts and search for [O iii] λ4959, λ5007 emission from spatially extended regions, or voorwerpjes, with the goal of using them to examine past luminosity history. Although we do not detect, voorwerpjes surrounding the four quasar host galaxies, we take advantage of the dim nuclear emission to characterize the colors and morphologies of the host galaxies. Three of the four galaxies show morphological evidence of merger activity or tidal features in their residuals. The three galaxies that are not highly distorted are fit with a single Sérsic profile to characterize their overall surface brightness profiles. The single-Sérsic fits give intermediate Sérsic indices between the n = 1 of disk galaxies and the n = 4 of ellipticals. On a color–magnitude diagram, our CL quasar host galaxies reside in the blue cloud, with other active galactic nucleus (AGN) host galaxies and star-forming galaxies. On a color-Sérsic index diagram the CL quasar hosts reside with other AGN hosts in the “green valley.” Our analysis suggests that the hosts of CL quasars are predominantly disrupted or merging galaxies that resemble AGN hosts, rather than inactive galaxies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→