MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2921085831 · doi:10.4095/314498

A reconnaissance section through the Neoproterozoic Katherine Group of the northern Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories, and implications for mapping its subdivisions

2019· report· en· W2921085831 on OpenAlexaffabout
K M Fallas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSection (typography)GeologyGroup (periodic table)GeographyArchaeologySubdivisionPhysical geographyGeomorphologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reconnaissance section FNA16A documents a well-exposed section through the Neoproterozoic Katherine Group and Cambrian Nainlin Formation along a creek in southwest Sans Sault Rapids map area (NTS 106H), northern Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories. It provides a useful control point for the character and thickness of units not typically well-exposed in the northern Mackenzie Mountains, and will assist in the mapping of these units. The described units include: the uppermost Tsezotene Formation (interbedded mudrock, dolostone, and sandstone), the Eduni Formation (sandstone dominated), Tawu Formation (interbedded mudrock and sandstone), the Grafe River Formation (sandstone dominated), the Etagochile Formation (mudrock, sandstone, and dolostone), the Shattered Range Formation (sandstone dominated), the Nainlin Formation (red-weathering mudrocks and minor sandstone), and the lowermost beds of the Franklin Mountain Formation (dolostone). Identification of the recessive intervals within Tawu and Etagochile formations is important for the mapping of the formations of the lower Katherine Group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.906

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→