MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921108218 · doi:10.1063/1.5086753

Measuring heat flux from collective Thomson scattering with non-Maxwellian distribution functions

2019· article· en· W2921108218 on OpenAlexaff
R.J. Henchen, M. Sherlock, W. Rozmus, J. Katz, P. E. Masson-Laborde, D. Cao, J. P. Palastro, D. H. Froula

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Plasmas · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsThomson scatteringPhysicsHeat fluxPlasmaElectron temperatureScatteringFlux (metallurgy)Temperature gradientAtomic physicsElectronComputational physicsHeat transferMechanicsOpticsNuclear physicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heat flux was measured in coronal plasmas using collective Thomson scattering from electron-plasma waves. A laser-produced plasma from a planar aluminum target created a temperature gradient along the target normal. Thomson scattering probed electron-plasma waves in the direction of the temperature gradient with phase velocities relevant to heat flux. The heat-flux measurements were reduced from classical values inferred from the measured plasma conditions in regions with large temperature gradients and agreed with classical values for weak gradients. In regions where classical theory was invalid, the heat flux was determined by reproducing the measured Thomson-scattering spectra using electron distribution functions consistent with nonlocal thermal transport. Full-scale hydrodynamic simulations using both flux-limited thermal transport (FLASH) and the multigroup nonlocal Schurtz, Nicolaï, and Busquet models underestimated the heat flux at all locations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of PlasmasSame topicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasmaFrench-language works237,207