MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921118646 · doi:10.14738/assrj.62.6200

The complexity coefficient for acyclic networks measuring network density: Application to project management

2019· article· en· W2921118646 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Luis F. Copertari

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Social Sciences Research Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGraph theory and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsNode (physics)Arc (geometry)Computer scienceDirected acyclic graphMathematicsTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A complexity coefficient applied to acyclic networks for project management measuring network density, not its structure, is presented, analyzed and discussed. Both the Activity on Arc (AOA) and the Activity on Node (AON) paradigms are considered. Based on the restriction that the project network needs to be acyclic, it is possible to define strict bounds to the complexity coefficient. In this case, the complexity coefficient, named eta, varies between zero and one, and measures only network density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.211
GPT teacher head0.487
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Social Sciences Research JournalSame topicGraph theory and applicationsFrench-language works237,207