MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2921129401 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz006.120

A121 LACK OF CRP RESPONSE IN CROHN’S DISEASE ASSOCIATED WITH LOWER RATES OF BIOLOGIC THERAPY: RESULTS OF A SINGLE CENTER CASE-CONTROL STUDY

2019· article· en· W2921129401 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joshua Nero, Mowad Benguzzi, Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez, Sharyle Fowler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCalprotectinC-reactive proteinCrohn's diseaseInternal medicineGastroenterologyInflammatory bowel diseaseBiomarkerDiseaseInflammationFaecal calprotectinRegimenUlcerative colitisClinical endpointImmunologyRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a type of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that causes inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. C-reactive protein (CRP) is an inflammatory biomarker measured in the serum that is typically elevated during periods of disease activity and assists with guiding therapy. Previous studies have shown that 20–25% of CD patients do not produce CRP during IBD flares, due to genetic polymorphisms in the CRP-producing gene. It was hypothesized that this subset of patients will be on a different treatment regimen than CD patients that do produce CRP. We conducted this case-control study to evaluate the treatment differences in CRP-non-producing CD patients as compared with CRP-producing CD patients. Charts of outpatients seen in a GI clinic in Saskatoon over a two-year period were evaluated. Patients were assigned to two arms: CRP-producers and CRP-nonproducers. CRP-nonproducers were defined as patients with a maximum CRP level less than 10.5 mg/L with objective evidence of inflammation during a flare of CD, such as inflammation on endoscopy, imaging, or an elevated fecal calprotectin. A total of 265 CD patients were included, with 57 CRP-nonproducers (21.5%), and a mean follow-up time of 2.9 years. The primary end point was the class of IBD medication taken at the start and conclusion of the study. Secondary end points included duration and location of disease, age at diagnosis, requirement of surgical therapy for CD, follow-up time, number of visits to the IBD clinic, number of IBD-related hospitalizations, ferritin, hemoglobin, B12, and albumin levels. Results were analyzed with Fischer’s exact test and the Z-test. From the 265 CD patients reviewed, a total of 57 CRP-non-producers (21.5%) were identified. Compared to CRP-producers, CRP-nonproducers were less likely to be on biologic therapy at the start of the study (23% vs 35%, p=0.044; odds ratio 0.66) and at the conclusion of the study (47% vs 65%, p=0.007; odds ratio 0.72). CRP-nonproducers were much more likely to be on no therapy or 5-aminosalicylates at the start of the study (68% vs 43%, p=0.0006; odds ratio 1.58) and at the end of the study (44% vs 25%, p=0.005; odds ratio 1.76). Lack of a CRP response in Crohn’s disease was associated with lower rates of biologic therapy. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→