MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921155825 · doi:10.4324/9780429480133-8

Dissociative identity disorder, culture, and memory

2018· book-chapter· en· W2921155825 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lina Hartocollis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicIdentity, Memory, and Therapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissociative identity disorderPsychologyIdentity (music)DissociativePsychoanalysisPsychotherapistArtPsychiatryAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The focus on sexual abuse also gave rise to the trauma-dissociation theory of dissociative identity disorder, in which the sexually abused child defends against the overwhelming experience of trauma by segregating or dissociating the memories of the abuse from consciousness and locating them within alter personalities. In a similar vein, investigated Canadian criminal court reports of historic sexual abuse and found that most court cases related to false memory involved memories which were reconstructed or retrieved in the course of therapy rather than spontaneous memories which emerged outside of therapy. The researchers concluded that therapist expectation can lead to the creation of false memories. Overall, research has demonstrated that memory is fallible, susceptible to social influence and reconstruction, and affected by the age and developmental stage of the individual and by other endogenous and exogenous factors and processes which we only partially understand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIdentity, Memory, and TherapyFrench-language works237,207