MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921218192 · doi:10.1039/c9lc00128j

Semi-automated on-demand control of individual droplets with a sample application to a drug screening assay

2019· article· en· W2921218192 on OpenAlexafffund
Marie Hébert, Matthew Courtney, Carolyn L. Ren

Bibliographic record

VenueLab on a Chip · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Canadian institutionsRegional Municipality of WaterlooUniversity of Waterloo
FundersWaterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of WaterlooNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsMicrofluidicsRepeatabilityOn demandThroughputSortingComputer scienceNanotechnologyTracking (education)Mixing (physics)Flow control (data)FabricationSample (material)Drug deliverySimulationBiological systemBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringChemistryChromatographyAlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automated control of individual droplets in microfluidic channels offers tremendous potential for applications requiring high accuracy and minimal user involvement. The feasibility of active droplet control has been previously demonstrated with pressure-driven flow control and visual feedback, but the manual operation required to perform droplet manipulations limited the accuracy, repeatability, and throughput. The present study improves upon the aforementioned challenges with a higher-level algorithm capturing the dynamics of droplet motion for a semi-automated control system. With a simple T junction geometry, droplets can now be automatically and precisely controlled on-demand. Specifically, there is ±10% accuracy for droplet generation, ±1.3% monodispersity for 500 μm long droplets and ±4% accuracy for splitting ratios. On-demand merging, mixing, and sorting are also demonstrated as well as the application of a drug screening assay related to neurodegenerative disorders. Overall, this system serves as a foundation for a fully automated system that does not require valves, embedded electrodes, or complex multi-layer fabrication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLab on a ChipSame topicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques InnovationFrench-language works237,207