MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Association between urinary, bowel, and hormonal treatment-related symptoms and clinical outcomes in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC): PROSPER study.

2019· article· en· W2921257975 on OpenAlexaff
Fred Saad, Robert Morlock, Cristina Ivanescu, Jennifer Sugg, Bertrand Tombal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioInternal medicineProstate cancerConfidence intervalOncologyProportional hazards modelUrinary systemMetastasisCancerGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

233 Background: PROSPER data were analyzed to assess the relationship between time to worsening of urinary, bowel, and hormonal treatment-related symptoms and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and the longitudinal association between symptom changes and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Methods: 1401 patients (pts) with nmCRPC at high metastasis risk were randomized 2:1 to enzalutamide (ENZA) or placebo. Urinary, bowel, and hormonal treatment-related symptoms were assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-PR25) at baseline (BL) and every 16 weeks. The association between time to first clinically meaningful symptom worsening and PSA response (≥50% decline from BL) was analyzed with stratified Cox regression using treatment as a covariate. Longitudinal symptom changes and MFS were evaluated in joint models using symptom scores as covariates, adjusted for treatment and clinical/demographic variables. The proportion of pts with improvement, no change, or deterioration at metastasis were analyzed by treatment group. Results: 723/1401 (52%) pts were PSA responders, including >90% of ENZA pts. PSA responders were significantly less likely to develop urinary, bowel, and hormone treatment-related symptoms vs. non-responders (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58 [95% confidence interval 0.41, 0.81]; 0.59 [0.43, 0.80]; and 0.70 [0.51, 0.97], respectively). Every 9-point increase in urinary symptom score was associated with a 10% increased metastasis risk (HR 1.1 [1.05, 1.15]). Bowel and hormonal symptoms did not predict metastasis. Most pts reported no EORTC score changes at metastasis and maintained stable urinary/bowel symptoms, with no major observed symptom differences between treatment groups. Conclusions: ENZA delays metastasis and extends time to symptom worsening. A ≥50% PSA reduction from BL is associated with a reduction in risk for urinary, bowel, and hormonal treatment-related symptom worsening; changes in urinary symptoms from BL also predict metastases. Clinical trial information: NCT02003924 (PROSPER).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread0.401 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→