Dos personalidades de la arquitectura del paisaje en América: Frederick Todd, Montreal - Benito Carrasco, Buenos Aires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La arquitectura del paisaje en América presenta, a pesar de la vastedad del continente, ciertas similitudes en los comienzos de su evolución. Los proyectos y los escritos de Frederick Todd y Benito Carrasco, quienes desarrollaron una vasta obra que afianzó la profesión, exhiben cierto paralelismo en los estudios y prácticas que realizaron respectivamente en Canadá y en la Argentina. Jóvenes países estos, caracterizados por la amplitud geográfica, la diversidad y la riqueza paisajística, la importancia de las corrientes inmigratorias en su constitución, los procesos de colonización, así como por la necesidad de la efectiva ocupación del territorio y la conveniencia de la planificación de sus ciudades. Empeñados ambos en pos de su desarrollo, también en el campo del paisaje.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".