MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921408071 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2019.2904580

Wireless Multifrequency Feature Set to Simplify Human 3-D Pose Estimation

2019· article· en· W2921408071 on OpenAlexaff
M. Senthil Raja, Aidan J. Hughes, Yixuan Xu, Parham Zarei, David G. Michelson, Stephan Sigg

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTorsoFeature (linguistics)Computer scienceMultipath propagationArtificial intelligenceComputer visionChannel (broadcasting)Feature extractionFeature vectorSet (abstract data type)Pattern recognition (psychology)Data setDoppler effectSIGNAL (programming language)WirelessTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a multifrequency feature set to detect driver's three-dimensional (3-D) head and torso movements from fluctuations in the radio frequency channel due to body movements. Current features used for movement detection are based on the time-of-flight, received signal strength, and channel state information and come with the limitations of coarse tracking, sensitivity toward multipath effects, and handling corrupted phase data, respectively. There is no standalone feature set that accurately detects small and large movements and determines the direction in 3-D space. We resolve this problem by using two radio signals at widely separated frequencies in a monostatic configuration. By combining information about displacement, velocity, and direction of movements derived from the Doppler effect at each frequency, we expand the number of existing features. We separate pitch, roll, and yaw movements of head from torso and arm. The extracted feature set is used to train a K-Nearest Neighbor classification algorithm, which could provide behavioral awareness to cars while being less invasive as compared to camera-based systems. The training results on data from four participants reveal that the classification accuracy is 77.4% at 1.8 GHz, it is 87.4% at 30 GHz, and multifrequency feature set improves the accuracy to 92%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation LettersSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207