MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921453458 · doi:10.1190/geo2017-0494.1

Coupled simulation of electromagnetic induction and induced polarization effects using stretched exponential relaxation

2017· article· en· W2921453458 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Belliveau, Eldad Haber

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscretizationExponential functionComputer scienceTime domainQuasistatic processInduced polarizationAlgorithmDepth soundingApplied mathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisMathematicsElectrical resistivity and conductivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have developed a new algorithm for 3D time-domain electromagnetic (EM) modeling, taking full account of induced polarization (IP) and the coupling between EM and IP effects. The algorithm can be used to model grounded source IP surveys that indicate EM induction effects and airborne time-domain EM surveys that exhibit IP effects. IP effects are most often approximated as static or modeled in the frequency domain, using frequency-dependent electrical conductivity. It is difficult to translate the frequency-dependent conductivity approach directly to the time domain in a computationally efficient manner. We take an alternative approach in which we model IP relaxations in time using the stretched exponential (SE) function. We incorporate this IP model into a direct time-stepping discretization of the quasistatic time-domain Maxwell equations. We found that modeling of IP effects with this SE approach is asymptotically equivalent to the commonly used Cole-Cole model of IP transformed to the time domain. We have implemented our algorithm using efficient numerical methods that allow it to tackle large-scale problems and are amenable to use in inversion. In particular, we have developed a parallel time-stepping technique that allows us to compute transient electric fields at multiple time steps simultaneously. We demonstrate the behavior of the SE model of IP decay and the efficiency of our algorithm by applying it to synthetic numerical examples that simulate a grounded source IP survey with significant EM effects and a concentric-loop airborne EM sounding over a chargeable body.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207