Bibliographic record
Abstract
The participation of Romania at the First World War is one of the most important facts from its entire history. But there are a lot of facts which reveal some underground facts and mysteries. Romania was in 1914 secretly associated in the Triple Alliance (Central Powers) even one of the allies, Austria-Hungary refused any consideration concerning the problem of Romanians in the double monarchy. The Russian Empire succeeded to get close on Romanian diplomacy, in June 2014, after a visit of Tsar Nicholas II at Constanta, even King Charles I of Romania was member of a German dynasty and Romania and Germany were relied in the Central Powers alliance. In Romania, the "Russophobe feeling " after the War of 1877-1878 took some higher quotes, but politicians had kept secret the alliance with Austria-Hungary (this secret treaty signed in October 30 1883, was known only by the King, his President of the Ministers Council and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs).Romania refused to join Austria-Hungary after this member of Central Powers declared war on Serbia in July 28 1914, a month after the assassination of Heir Prince Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary. Romania said that were not accomplished the conditions of "casus belli" the because Austria-Hungary was not aggressed being the aggressor, which cancelled the Treaty article referring to "casus belli".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".