MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921477254 · doi:10.4000/episteme.3733

Les Pensées de Pascal : six épithètes au service de l’apologie

2006· article· fr· W2921477254 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphane Natan

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes Épistémè · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans les Pensées, Pascal veut convaincre son lecteur que le christianisme — ou plus précisément le jansénisme — représente la vérité : afin de mener à bien son projet apologétique, il utilise une rhétorique particulière, la rhétorique de l’efficacité et de la force, destinée à faire entrer la vérité dans l’esprit de son destinataire. Concrètement, Pascal va utiliser six épithètes — vrai, véritable, seul, unique, petit et grand — qui reviennent de manière récurrente tout au long des Pensées. Ces termes, hérités d’une longue tradition littéraire chrétienne, vont se charger de connotations très différentes en fonction des noms qu’ils vont compléter. Dans les Pensées, ces six épithètes ont une fonction commune : promouvoir la vérité du christianisme face à la misère de l’homme sans Dieu. Par voie de conséquence, ces termes vont avoir une fonction essentielle dans le projet apologétique de Pascal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes ÉpistémèSame topicFrench Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207