An assessment of the economics of adopting stewardship practices in livestock production in response to environmental and societal concerns
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The major objective of this report is to present a review of the state-of-the-art of literature pertinent to the measurement of the economic value of benefits and costs to Canadian society from livestock production and related activities. Included in this review are studies identifying various pathways where goods and services provided by natural ecosystems can be affected by livestock production, thereby affecting welfare of society as a whole. A majority of the literature reviewed deals with the physical relationships between livestock production and the environment, which typically is the first step in the economic valuation of environmental externalities. The objectives of this study can be divided into the following. 1. To identify various livestock production activities and their pathways that from a conceptual perspective could impact society directly or indirectly. 2. To review relevant studies with respect to identified impacts on society either in physical units or in value form. 3. To assess the state of the art in the valuation of impacts identified, and, 4. Suggest and recommend areas for future work in the valuation of externalities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it