MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

16 Myocardial extracellular volume in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing valve intervention: a <i>multicentre T1 mapping study</i>

2019· article· en· W2921568080 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Russell J. Everett, Thomas A. Treibel, Miho Fukui, Heesun Lee, Marzia Rigolli, Anvesha Singh, Petra Bijsterveld, Lionel Tastet, Tarique A Musa, Laura E Dobson, Calvin Chin, Gabriella Captur, Stephanie Funk, Jeanette Schulz‐Menger, Erik B. Schelbert, Marie‐Annick Clavel, David E. Newby, Saul Myerson, P. Pibarot, João L. Cavalcante, Seung‐Pyo Lee, Gerry P McCann, John P. Greenwood, James Moon, Marc R. Dweck

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineAortic valve replacementStenosisAortic valve stenosisEjection fractionCoronary artery diseaseMyocardial fibrosisAortic valveFibrosisHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Diffuse myocardial fibrosis is a key decompensation mechanism in advanced aortic stenosis (AS) and can be quantified using CMR T1 mapping techniques. Purpose To assess T1 mapping measures of fibrosis in patients with severe AS referred for aortic valve replacement, and determine their associations with clinical characteristics, disease severity and clinical outcome. Methods In this international prospective cohort study, patients with severe AS underwent CMR at 1.5T and 3T (Siemens/Philips) with T1 mapping prior to AVR. Image analysis was performed (CVI42, Circle) by a single core laboratory for three T1 mapping measures (native T1, extracellular volume fraction [ECV%] and indexed extracellular volume [iECV=LVMi*ECV%]). Results Four-hundred patients (70±10 years, 60% male) from nine international centres (Canada/Germany/Korea/USA/UK) were enrolled (including 144 patients from BSCMR AS700 study). AVR was performed (SAVR: n=342, TAVI: n=58) 19 [4-61] days following CMR, with median of 3.8 [1.7–4.5] years follow-up and 40 deaths recorded. As expected, native T1 was higher at 3T than 1.5T (1213±57 versus 1050±48 ms, p<0.001); ECV% did not vary by scanner manufacturer, field strength or T1 mapping sequence (all p>0.30); therefore, only ECV-based measures were analysed. ECV% correlated with increasing age, Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score, known coronary artery disease, lower aortic valve peak velocity, increased LV mass, presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and reduced LVEF (p<0.05 for all). Following adjustment for demographic and clinical variables, ECV% remained associated with both LVEF (p<0.001) and mass index (p=0.043). Similar associations were seen with iECV. A progressive increase in all-cause mortality was seen across tertiles of ECV% (14.0, 28.5 and 53.7 deaths per 1000 patient-years; log-rank test, p=0.003). ECV% was independently associated with all-cause mortality following adjustment for age, sex, peak velocity, impaired LVEF and presence of LGE (HR per% increase in ECV%: 1.13, 95%, 1.04–1.24, p=0.006). iECV was associated with all-cause mortality following adjustment for age and sex (HR 1.03 95% 1.00–1.06, p=0.04) but not after adjustment for the above clinical variables. Conclusion In patients with severe AS scheduled for AVR, extracellular volume-based T1 mapping measures are robust, track with LV decompensation, and independently predict late all-cause mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstractsSame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207