MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921593243 · doi:10.14510/araj.2019.4218

OBICEIURI ȘI INTELIGENŢE ÎN SOCIETATEA CONȘTIINȚEI

2019· article· ro· W2921593243 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dumitru Micusa, Nicoleta Todoroi, Dumitru Todoroi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Romanian Academy of Arts and Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languagero
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAppreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

de faptul cum arat sau de ce cred cei de alturi despre el, ci cum s supravieuiasc de la o zi la alta i cum s in piept grelelor ncercri ale sorii Omul e unica fiin cu raiune pe Terra, e unicul care poate face din nimic ceva i transforma imposibilul n posibil. De la pietre i bee a ajuns la nave i roboi i totui nu a uitat de unde a pornit. n acest proiect se va arta importana obiceiurilor strvechi n societatea de azi, la fel i a valorilor de care aceasta e dominat, se va vorbi despre rolul robointeligenei ntr-o nou societate a contiinei dar i despre sentimentele naionale de care ne mndrim

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Romanian Academy of Arts and SciencesSame topicAppreciative Inquiry and Organizational ChangeFrench-language works237,207