Early postoperative reactions following lateral sinus floor elevation using piezosurgery: A radiographic study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Early postoperative reactions occur following lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE). This article radiographically describes, quantifies, and measures these early postoperative changes inside grafted maxillary sinus area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 24 patients, 31 maxillary sinuses were performed using piezosurgery and grafted by bioceramic materials. Cone beam computed tomography was done preoperatively and then postoperatively, randomly, at either day 1 (n = 6), 2 (n = 11), 3 (n = 8), or 7 (n = 6) and at 6 months for all patients. Membrane thickening and subsequent swelling ratio, submucosal edema, and air bubbles inside grafted area were noted and measured. Inflammation was classified as mild, moderate, or severe. RESULTS: Preoperative mean membrane thickness was 0.75 mm then following LSFE it significantly increased at days 1, 2, 3, and 7 and was respectively 2.36, 4.14, 6.05, and 6.63 mm. Mean swelling ratio significantly increased over time and was 11.37, 13.73, 16.34 and 35.78 at days 1, 2, 3, and 7, respectively. Submucosal edema height was noted in 24 cases. It had a mean value of 3.35 mm and increased significantly with time. Inflammation inside grafted area was mild in 7, moderate in 15, and severe in 9 of the cases. It significantly increased with time. Apical air bubble was present in 19 cases and had mean dimensions of 6.6 × 4.6 mm. No inflammatory signs were noted at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory reactions are always noted following LSFE and tend to increase with time reaching peak values at 7 days. All inflammatory changes significantly subsided at 6 months.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".