MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921618183 · doi:10.33364/algoritma/v.15-2.79

Perencanaan Sistem Informasi Administrasi di Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini

2018· article· id· W2921618183 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Algoritma · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEdcuational Technology Systems
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pendidikan anak usia dini merupakan suatu jenjang Pendidikan sebelum Pendidikan dasar, hal ini ditujukan auntuk anak semenjak lahir hingga usia sekolah sekitar enam tahun, dalam pendidikannya anak diberikan rangsangan agar kelak bisa menumbuhkan suatu perkembangan yang baik, dari segi rohani maupun jasmani sampai nanti saatnya memasuki jenjang Pendidikan dasar. Permasalahan yang terjadi diantaranya yaitu proses pendaftaran yang masih ditulis tangan sehingga rekapitulasi membutuhkan waktu yang cukup lama, pencarian data siswa, terjadi kesalahan dalam proses pembayaran pendaftaran siswa pembayaran SPP siswa serta lamanya pembuatan laporanlaporan yang dibutuhkan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk perencanaan system informasi administrasi di Pendidikan anak usia dini. Metode yang digunakan adalah Unified Software Development Process dan pemodelan Unified Modelling Language dibatasi hanya sampai model perancangan. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah perencanaan system informasi untu Pendidikan anak usia dini.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it