MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Prevalence of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis

2010· article· en· W2921630531 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sacha Sidani, Catherine Vincent, Mickaël Bouin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHôpital Saint-Luc
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmall intestinal bacterial overgrowthMedicineGastroenterologyHydrogen breath testInternal medicineLactuloseBreath testCirrhosisPrimary biliary cirrhosisEtiologyIntestinal permeabilityIrritable bowel syndromeHelicobacter pylori

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: An alteration of intestinal motility has been documented in cirrhosis in general, predisposing to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). There are scarce data concerning the occurrence of SIBO in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). We hypothesize that the prevalence of SIBO is higher in PBC than in cirrhosis due to other etiologies. AIMS: 1) To determine the occurrence of SIBO in patients with PBC. 2) To identify characteristics of patients with SIBO. Methods: Prospective study from 2006 to 2008 at the Saint-Luc Hospital (Montreal, QC, Canada). All participants diagnosed with PBC during the study period had a lactulose hydrogen breath test. Patients were classified as having SIBO if 1 of the following 2 criteria was satisfied: 1) increase in breath hydrogen more than 12 parts per million (ppm) compared to basal production on 2 consecutive measures at 15 minutes intervals before 90 minutes or 2) dual hydrogen peaks (12 ppm increase over baseline with decrease of ≥5 ppm before second peak). In addition, the following parameters were studied: demographic data, digestive clinical symptoms and signs, Child-Pugh and Mayo scores. Results: 52 patients were recruited (50 females, mean age 57±11 years). 36.5 % of patients (n=19) had a test suggestive of SIBO and 63.5% (n=33) had a test considered normal. The patients with SIBO and those without SIBO were similar in terms of age (60.4±10.8 vs. 55.6±13.8; NS), sex and body mass index (25.3±3.5 vs. 24.5±5.1; NS). The following clinical and biological parameters were similar in both groups: presence of abdominal pain or bloating, presence of other related disorders such as scleroderma and celiac disease, transaminases, bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase levels. Diarrhea was less common in the group with SIBO than in the group without SIBO (25% and 64%, respectively, p<0.05). The Mayo severity score of cirrhosis was not different in patients with or without SIBO (4.84±1.42 vs. 5.0±1.28; NS), and most of our patients (50/52) had a Child-Pugh score of A. Conclusion: 36.5% of patients with PBC had a lactulose hydrogen breath test result in favor of SIBO, a proportion higher than what is reported in studies with alcoholic cirrhosis in patients with Child A cirrhosis (17 to 20%). Besides fewer occurrence of diarrhea, no clinical factor was associated with this abnormality. The high occurrence of SIBO in PBC suggests that intestinal transit alterations thus exist in PBC and need to be characterized further.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→