MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921684690

Numerical enhancement of a mesoscale model for large-eddy simulation of the wind over steep terrain

2018· article· en· W2921684690 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Flores Maradiaga, Alex Geovanny

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesoscale meteorologyTerrainDownscalingMeteorologyLarge eddy simulationWind powerWind resource assessmentEnvironmental scienceGeologyTurbulence kinetic energyWind speedTurbulenceWind directionEngineeringGeographyPrecipitation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mesoscale modelling of the atmospheric boundary layer has advanced significantly over the past decades, although there are still different numerical aspects that must be enhanced to achieve accurate wind simulations over steep topography. This has become a necessity since many applications, such as wind resource assessment, now require high fidelity results for viability analysis and decision-making. With the advent of high performance computing and more sophisticated software, the wind energy industry is increasingly interested in multiscale models based on combined configurations capable of yielding higher resolution results. The size of the modern wind farms now requires a multiscale analysis that allows the evaluation of the joint meso- and microscale processes triggered over complex topography. For this reason, mesoscale models with imbedded large-eddy simulation capabilities are well suited to become the next mainstream family of simulation toolkits for wind engineering. The Mesoscale Compressible Community (MC2) model, subject of this work, is a good example since it is employed as the kernel of the Wind Energy Simulation Toolkit (WEST), introduced by the Recherche en Prevision Numerique (RPN) group of Environment Canada. MC2 performs well for wind simulations over flat, gentle and moderate terrain slopes, which led the wind energy community to be confident enough on employing it to generate the Canadian Wind Atlas. However, as with other similar models, several numerical issues such as wind overestimation and distorted circulation patterns have been identified in recent years from orographic flow simulations in presence of steep slopes. Hence, wind resource assessment over high impact topography, such as the Rocky Mountains or the Niagara Escarpment, cannot be entirely reliable and needs a revaluation with enhanced multiscale modelling. By applying an eigenmode analysis, we have recognized the numerical instability and precisely measured the spurious noise problem, inherent of MC2’s classical three time-level semi-implicit (SI) scheme. With the appropriate redefinition of the prognostic thermodynamic variables, the SI time discretization, coupled with the semi-Lagrangian (SL) scheme, is now consistently structured in a way that it enables MC2 to solve the compressible non-hydrostatic Euler equations (EE) in a more stable and accurate fashion. MC2 is now able to perform wind simulations over steep slopes in the absence of time decentering, frequency filtering and other numerical damping mechanisms. Additionally, the climate-state classification of the statistical-dynamical downscaling (SDD) method is upgraded by including the Brunt-Vaisala frequency that accounts for the atmospheric thermal stratification effect on wind flow over topography. The present study provides a real orographic flow validation of these numerical enhancements in MC2, assessing their individual and combined contribution for an improved initialization and calculation of the surface wind in presence of high-impact terrain. Lastly, the metric tensor adaptation of MC2’s imbedded large-eddy simulation (LES) method, necessary for wind modelling over mountainous terrain, has been achieved preserving the enhanced numerical stability and accuracy. Test results indicate that the enhanced MC2-LES model reproduces efficiently the expected flow patterns, separation and recirculation zone over steep terrain, and yields accurate results comparable to those reported from experimental data or by other researchers who use numerical models with similar or more sophisticated turbulence closure schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207