MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921720892 · doi:10.1093/jbcr/irz013.367

473 The Application of Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix in Burn Reconstructive Surgery: Preliminary Results of 36 cases

2019· article· en· W2921720892 on OpenAlexfundno aff
X Liu, Sai R Velamuri, Mahmoud Hassouba, David M Hill, William L. Hickerson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Burn Care & Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWound Healing and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMitacsNatural Environment Research CouncilEuropean Commission
KeywordsMedicineSurgerySkin graftingEctropionReconstructive surgeryHematomaPerineumRetrospective cohort studyEyelid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM) is a synthetic polyurethane dermal substitute which lacks synthetizing proteins and, based on the published literature, offers higher resistance to infections. BTM was applied as a dermal substitute for wound resurfacing and reconstruction. We present the preliminary results of 36 cases of BTM application in acute burn wound resurfacing and chronic complex wound reconstructive surgery. A retrospective review of BTM application with split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) in acute burn injury and chronic complex wounds over one year period at a single institution was conducted. All wounds were repaired by BTM placement and STSG in a two staged procedure. The demographic data, surgical techniques, complications and follow up results are presented in detail. Thirty-six patients were evaluated. Acute burn wounds (16/36) or chronic complex wounds (20/36) with bone, joints, and tendons exposed underwent reconstructive surgery using BTM combined with STSG in a two stage procedure. There were 14 females and 22 male patients. Ages ranged from 19 to 67 years with mean age of 46.4±13.3 years. The anatomical location included head and neck (5/36), extremities (23/36), and trunk/perineum (8/36). The size of the wounds ranged from 12 cm2 to 3189 cm2 with mean 402.8± 656.2 cm2. Complications included hematoma (3/36), infection (7/36), [RV1] total BTM loss (4/36) and eyelid ectropion (3/36). Complete loss of BTM resulted from hematoma and infection. Three patients had salvage of the skin substitute using irrigation post operatively. Three cases of lower extremity wounds were not able to be salvaged and required below the knee amputations. We encountered three cases of lower eyelid ectropion in head and neck reconstructed patients. One severe case required release with skin grafting while, the other two responded to conservative measures of taping and massage. All other cases were reconstructed successfully. The follow up time was between 3 months to 15 months with mean 8.5±3.4 months. Biodegradeable Temporizing Matrix (BTM) may be a reliable method to resurface acute burn and chronic complex wounds. A further research study with long term follow up is needed to investigate its viable role as a dermal substitute. BTM may be used as an alternative to resurface and reconstruct burn and chronic wounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Burn Care & ResearchSame topicWound Healing and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207