MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921746465 · doi:10.14510/araj.2019.4219

EVOLUTIA ECONOMIEI ROMANIEI DUPA UN DECENIU DE LA ADERAREA EI LA UE

2019· article· es· W2921746465 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mihai Patras

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Romanian Academy of Arts and Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laureat al Premiilor AȘM și al Academiei RomâneREZUMAT.În lucrare sunt expuse realizările socio-economice și politice obținute de România pe parcursul unui deceniu de dezvoltare ascendentă în cadrul UE.Urmare a schimbării în bine a statutului european dar și internațional al României după anul 2007 ea a devenit atractivă pentru investitorii străini.Urmare a creșterii rapide și substanțiale a investițiilor din statele UE și SUA (pînă la 9-12 mld dolari) România a devenit țara cu cel mai mare PIB din regiune (egal cu cca.200, 0 mld.dolari) devansând nu doar Ucraina, dar și Grecia.Concomitent ea a reușit să diminueze cu 24 p.p. timp de un deceniu decalajul său dintre PIBul per/capita față de media curentă.Un succes semnificativ constă în faptul, că în trimestrul II, 2018 s-a realizat un salariu mediu pe economie de aproape 1000 dol./lună, ceea ce reprezintă un important reper socio-economic: pe de o parte s-a redus simțitor numărul celor cu intenții de a pleca la muncă în alte state, iar pe de altă parte crește numărul românilor, care doresc să revină definitiv în patrie.În ultimii ani România are cele mai mari ritmuri de creștere economică din UE, este principalul partener comercial al Republicii Moldova.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Romanian Academy of Arts and SciencesSame topicRegional Development and PolicyFrench-language works237,207