MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921748069 · doi:10.15740/has/ijps/14.1/19-24

Assessment of antifungal activity of phytoextracts on Fusarium wilt of lentil

2019· article· en· W2921748069 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pawan L. Deshmukh, Umesh Mogle

Bibliographic record

VenueINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL PLANT SCIENCES · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSeed and Plant Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyAntifungalBotanyFusariumFusarium wiltFusarium oxysporumMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cultivation of pulses has been practiced from thousands of years. Ancient civilizations in Mesopotamia grew peas, beans and lentils as far back as 8 000 BC. India is one of the second largest lentil producers in the world after Canada. In South Asian cuisine, split lentils are known as Dal,the lentil is a dietary staple throughout regions of India and other developing countries in Asia. Majority of the production of lentil comes from Canada, India and Australia from total world production. These staple crops have been an integral part of human diets for millennia and today are an important crop not only for food security, but also for combating malnutrition, improving human health, alleviating poverty and enhancing agricultural sustainability. However, yield of lentil remains low due to biotic and abiotic stresses. One of the major biotic stress comes from Fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lentis) affect lentil and cause severe yield loss. In order to overcome biotic stress caused by Fusarium species eco-friendly biological methods has to be discovered in order to avoid the huge loss due to such biotic stress. This study mainly focused on the development of biological methods to combat against these biotic stresses in environmental friendly manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL PLANT SCIENCESSame topicSeed and Plant BiochemistryFrench-language works237,207