MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921760674 · doi:10.1101/577221

<i>In silico</i> identification of novel peptides with antibacterial activity against multidrug resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>

2019· preprint· en· W2921760674 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Linda Oyama, Hamza Olleik, Ana Carolina Nery Teixeira, Matheus M Guidini, James Pickup, Alan Cookson, Hannah Vallin, Toby Wilkinson, Denise Mara Soares Bazzolli, Jennifer Richards, Mandy Wootton, Ralf Mikut, Kai Hilpert, Marc Maresca, Josette Perrier, Matthias Hess, Hilário Cuquetto Mantovani, Narcís Fernández‐Fuentes, Christopher J. Creevey, Sharon Huws

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAntimicrobial Peptides and Activities
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilSt. George's, University of LondonResearch Councils UKLife Sciences Research Network WalesInstitute of Infection and ImmunityCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsIn silicoStaphylococcus aureusBacteriaBiologyAntimicrobial peptidesMultiple drug resistanceIn vivoMicrobiologyAntimicrobialIn vitroComputational biologyBiochemistryDrug resistanceGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Herein we report the identification and characterisation of two linear antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), HG2 and HG4, with activity against a wide range of multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria, especially methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains, a highly problematic group of Gram-positive bacteria in the hospital and community environment. To identify the novel AMPs presented here, we employed the classifier model design, a feature extraction method using molecular descriptors for amino acids for the analysis, visualization, and interpretation of AMP activities from a rumen metagenomic dataset. This allowed for the in silico discrimination of active and inactive peptides in order to define a small number of promising novel lead AMP test candidates for chemical synthesis and experimental evaluation. In vitro data suggest that the chosen AMPs are fast acting, show strong biofilm inhibition and dispersal activity and are efficacious in an in vivo model of MRSA USA300 infection, whilst showing little toxicity to human erythrocytes and human primary cell lines ex vivo . Observations from biophysical AMP-lipid-interactions and electron microscopy suggest that the newly identified peptides interact with the cell membrane and may be involved in the inhibition of other cellular processes. Amphiphilic conformations associated with membrane disruption are also observed in 3D molecular modelling of the peptides. HG2 and HG4 both preferentially bind to MRSA total lipids rather than with human cell lipids indicating that HG4 may form superior templates for safer therapeutic candidates for MDR bacterial infections. Author Summary We are losing our ability to treat multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria, otherwise known as superbugs. This poses a serious global threat to human health as bacteria are increasingly acquiring resistance to antibiotics. There is therefore urgent need to intensify our efforts to develop new safer alternative drug candidates. We emphasise the usefulness of complementing wet-lab and in silico techniques for the rapid identification of new drug candidates from environmental samples, especially antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). HG2 and HG4, the AMPs identified in our study show promise as effective therapies for the treatment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections both in vitro and in vivo whilst having little cytotoxicity against human primary cells, a step forward in the fight against MDR infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicAntimicrobial Peptides and ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207