MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921809397 · doi:10.4000/books.pub.6749

Les avatars d’un topos satirique : la danse macabre et le triomphe de la mort au théâtre et à l’opéra (Ghelderode et Ligeti)

2008· book-chapter· fr· W2921809397 on OpenAlexaff
Elisabeth Grodek

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses Universitaires de Bordeaux eBooks · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtMacabreHumanitiesArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Touchée par les guerres et les épidémies de peste, l’Europe médiévale tombe dans la fascination de la mort. Deux types d’iconographie liée à la pensée eschatologique apparaissent à cette époque : la danse macabre et le triomphe de la mort. La première, dont la France et l’Allemagne se disputent les origines, caractérise l’Europe du Nord, tandis que le triomphe de la mort voit le jour en Italie. Les deux représentations appartiennent au répertoire des discours (écrits et visuels) à visée satir...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses Universitaires de Bordeaux eBooksSame topicHistorical and Literary AnalysesFrench-language works237,207