Absolute Hidden Symmetry in Time and Absolute Asymmetry in Mass and Velocity between a Particle and Its Anti-Particle
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we will the discuss possible hidden symmetry in time and the possible asymmetry in mass and velocity between a particle and its anti-particle. Possible hidden symmetry in time between a particle and its anti-particle manifested in their corresponding possible hidden variables in time, fr and -fr  was first discussed in Brodet (2017b). In this paper we will extend the discussion and discuss how the above possible hidden symmetry in time and its corresponding possible symmetry in absolute position, energy and momentum, may yield an asymmetry in mass and velocity of a particle and its corresponding anti-particle. We will deconstruct the particle’s and anti-particle’s absolute position, into three complex number describing the particle/anti-particle time, velocity and mass. The particle/anti-particle symmetry and asymmetry of the above complex numbers will be discussed in the context of parity violation and the known asymmetry in angular production of particles and anti-particles. Moreover, the possible mass asymmetry will be used to explain the CP violation in the neutral kaon system. Finally, experimental ways to investigate and test the above are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it