MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921851126 · doi:10.1684/epd.2019.1024

EEG of asymptomatic first‐degree relatives of patients with juvenile myoclonic, childhood absence and rolandic epilepsy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

2019· review· en· W2921851126 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEpileptic Disorders · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJuvenile myoclonic epilepsyEndophenotypeElectroencephalographyMeta-analysisEpilepsyMedicineAudiologyFirst-degree relativesAsymptomaticPopulationChildhood absence epilepsyPsychologyPediatricsPsychiatryPathologyInternal medicineFamily historyCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rolandic (RE), childhood absence (CAE) and juvenile myoclonic (JME) epilepsy encompass centrotemporal sharp waves, 3-Hz spike waves and >3-Hz spike or polyspike waves, respectively. Evidence abounds for genetic roles in all three syndromes, yet involved genes for the vast majority of patients remain unknown. It has long been proposed that while each disease is genetically complex, its specific EEG trait may represent a genetically simpler endophenotype. This meta-analysis of the literature focuses on the frequency of EEG traits in clinically unaffected first-degree relatives towards determining inheritance patterns of the EEG endophenotypes. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for protocols (PRISMA-P) and searched Medline, EMBASE, CINHAL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Following extensive screening, 15 studies were included with a total of 3,858 asymptomatic relatives. The prevalence of 'abnormal' EEG waves was 21%, 42% and 33% for JME, CAE and RE, respectively, close to what would be expected based on Mendelian inheritance. However, breaking down the reported EEG abnormalities, most consisted not of the respective EEG signature traits -prevalences of which were as low as 5%- but of non-specific EEG 'abnormalities'/variants. Prevalence of non-specific EEG 'abnormalities'/variants in the general population ranges from 0.1 to 10%. Underlying this 100-fold-wide range is a spectrum of what is considered 'abnormal' or variant. The prevalences of 'abnormalities'/variants in asymptomatic siblings in RE, CAE and JME significantly exceed even the highest value in the general population and fall within Mendelian expectations. These results suggest that EEG 'abnormalities'/variants shared with the general population are enriched in the three syndromes and are endophenotypes inherited in a genetically simple near-Mendelian fashion. Future work with modern EEG variant definitions should uncover genetic variants contributing to neuronal hypersynchrony in epilepsy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it