MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2921852516 · doi:10.1161/circ.139.suppl_1.p053

Abstract P053: The Frequency of High Glycemic Load Meals is Predictive of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Children at Risk for Obesity After 2 Years

2019· article· en· W2921852516 on OpenAlexaff
Karine Suissa, Andrea Benedetti, Mélanie Henderson, Katherine Gray‐Donald, Gilles Paradis

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOverweightMealAnthropometryBlood pressureObesityBody mass indexGlycemicConfoundingWaistCohortInternal medicineGlycemic loadDiabetes mellitusDemographyGlycemic indexEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Consuming a daily diet of high glycemic load (GL) carbohydrates has potential long-term effects on obesity and cardiovascular health. However, it is possible that the GL of certain meals (breakfast, lunch and supper) have different effects. Few studies have examined the effect of meal-specific GL and frequency of high GL meals on adiposity and cardiovascular health in children. We hypothesized that the number of high GL meals per day, and secondarily, the meal-specific GL, would predict cardiovascular risk factors in children after two years of follow-up. Methods: We used data from the QUALITY cohort which recruited 630 children, ages 8-10 years at baseline with at least one obese parent. Three separate 24-hour dietary recalls were administered by a dietitian at baseline and individual meal-specific GL scores were calculated using the International table of GI. CV risk factors measured at 2 years of follow-up included continuous values of BMI z-score, percent fat mass, triglycerides, LDL and HDL cholesterol, and systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure obtained through direct measurement (blood pressure, blood lipids, anthropometrics) or questionnaires (socio-economic characteristics). Linear regressions between meal-specific GL categorized as high ( 2 33) vs. low (<33) and CV risk factors were estimated, adjusting for important confounders, including underreporting, as well as anthropometric, socio-economic and dietary factors. Secondary analysis consisted of linear regression with number of high GL meals as an ordinal exposure variable. Results: Mean age at baseline was 9.6 years, with 33% of children overweight or obese. Breakfast, lunch and supper glycemic load were positively associated with each other. A higher number of high GL meals was positively associated with BMI z-score (β=0.18, 95%CI: 0.06, 0.30), percent fat mass (β=1.74, 95%CI: 0.52, 2.96) and triglycerides (β=0.08, 95%CI: 0.03, 0.14) and negatively associated with HDL (β=-0.04, 95%CI: -0.07, -0.01). Our secondary analysis revealed that High breakfast GL was positively associated with increased triglycerides (β=0.14, 95%CI: 0.05, 0.23) after 2 years but not adiposity, HDL, LDL and blood pressure. High GL lunch (β=0.27, 95%CI: 0.08, 0.46) and supper (β=0.22, 95%CI: 0.02, 0.41) were associated with higher BMI z-score after 2 years. Conclusion: In conclusion, consuming more than one high GL meal per day is associated with greater BMI and unhealthy lipid profile after 2 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicNutritional Studies and Diet→French-language works237,207→