MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921856494 · doi:10.5962/p.363511

Population trends of nesting Glaucous-winged Gulls, Larus glaucescens, in the southern Strait of Georgia, British Columbia

2002· article· en· W2921856494 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Terry Sullivan, Stephanie Hazlitt, Moira Lemon

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Field-Naturalist · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsDelta-Q Technologies (Canada)Birds Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNesting (process)GeographyPopulationLarusFisheryDisturbance (geology)EcologyBiologyFish <Actinopterygii>Demography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Between 1986 and 1999, the number of nesting Glaucous-winged Gulls (Larus glaucescens) at fourteen breeding colonies declined by 31% (1610 nests) in the southern Strait of Georgia, British Columbia. Declines in the number of nesting pairs at surveyed colonies ranged between 6% and 81% with the smallest change occurring on the largest breeding colony in the study area. We suggest that Glaucous-winged Gull breeding population declines in the southern Strait of Georgia may be due to increased frequency of colony disturbance, in particular increased disturbance by Bald Eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Field-NaturalistSame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207