Identification of Psychological Characteristics of Flat Feet Preschool Children Using Projective Methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, the problem of prevention and correction of various diseases in preschool children has becomeparticularly relevant. This is due, first of all, the presence of a large number of preschoolers (84.9%) with differentdeviations in the state of health and with pathologies in the development of the musculoskeletal system in particular.The problem of studying the psychological characteristics of preschool children with orthopedic diseases seems to bequite relevant, although in contemporary scientific literature this issue has not been adequately reflected. The aim ofthe research is to identify the psychological characteristics of children of preschool age with a diagnosis of "flat feet"with the help of projective methods. The study was conducted among pupils of preschool educational institutions inMoscow, who are diagnosed with "flat feet" and conditionally healthy children (SWAD, WAD). The average age ofthe subjects was 6 years. As a result of the research, it has been found that children with a diagnosis of "flat feet",already in preschool age have certain changes in the emotional sphere, especially an increased level of anxiety andfear.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".