Designing lightweight deep learning models for echocardiography view classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transthoracic echocardiography (echo) is the most common imaging modality for diagnosis of cardiac conditions. Echo is acquired from a multitude of views, each of which distinctly highlights specific regions of the heart anatomy. In this paper, we present an approach based on knowledge distillation to obtain a highly accurate lightweight deep learning model for classification of 12 standard echocardiography views. The knowledge of several deep learning architectures based on the three common state-of-the-art architectures, VGG-16, DenseNet, and Resnet, are distilled to train a set of lightweight models. Networks were developed and evaluated using a dataset of 16,612 echo cines obtained from 3,151 unique patients across several ultrasound imaging machines. The best accuracy of 89.0% is achieved by an ensemble of the three very deep models while we show an ensemble of lightweight models has a comparable accuracy of 88.1%. The lightweight models have approximately 1% of the very deep model parameters and are six times faster in run-time. Such lightweight view classification models could be used to build fast mobile applications for real-time point-of-care ultrasound diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".